Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ABDUL RAHSEED, S/O.SHAIK MOHAMMED HAJI versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESETNED BY THE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


ABDUL RAHSEED, S/O.SHAIK MOHAMMED HAJI v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESETNED BY THE - Crl MC No. 3093 of 2006 [2007] RD-KL 73 (2 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 3093 of 2006()

1. ABDUL RAHSEED, S/O.SHAIK MOHAMMED HAJI,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESETNED BY THE
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :02/01/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J

Crl.M.C.No.3093 of 2006

Dated this the 2nd day of January, 2007

ORDER

The petitioner was granted anticipatory bail as per order of the learned Sessions Judge, Manjeri subject to conditions. Condition No.2 imposed on the petitioner is that he shall surrender his passport before the lower court. Accordingly, the passport had been surrendered. Later, the petitioner had got back the passport to perform a pilgrimage. Subsequently, he has surrendered the passport before the learned Magistrate as directed by this Court earlier in this Crl.M.C. The prayer of the petitioner is that condition No.2 imposed on him may be deleted and his passport may be released to him.

2. There is a further condition imposed as condition No.5 that the petitioner shall not leave the State without obtaining the prior permission of the lower court. The petitioner can make use of the passport only if he is granted permission under clause 5 of Annexure- A order passed by the Sessions Judge. Whenever the petitioner wants to go abroad, the petitioner can apply to the learned Magistrate for release of the passport to him showing the specific reason of the need for passport. The learned Magistrate shall pass appropriate orders on such applicationS. In the light of the opposition by the learned Public Prosecutor, I am satisfied, that it is not necessary now to direct Crl.M.C.No.3093 of 2006 2 release of the passport to the petitioner without any specific need or reason. As and when need arises, the petitioner can apply before the learned Magistrate and the learned Magistrate must consider the application on merits and pass appropriate orders subject to appropriate conditions, if necessary.

3. With the above observation, this Crl.M.C is, dismissed.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

rtr/- `


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.