Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

STATE OF KERALA versus PRABHAKARAN, S/O. RAMAN VAIDIAR

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


STATE OF KERALA v. PRABHAKARAN, S/O. RAMAN VAIDIAR - LA App No. 994 of 2002 [2007] RD-KL 7306 (9 April 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

LA App No. 994 of 2002()

1. STATE OF KERALA.
... Petitioner

Vs

1. PRABHAKARAN, S/O. RAMAN VAIDIAR,
... Respondent

2. BAHULEYAN, S/O. RAMAN,

3. VELUNNI, S/O. VELU, NEDUMPARAMBIL,

4. KESAVAN, S/O. RAMAN VAIDIAR, DO. (DIED).

5. BALARAMAN, S/O. DO. T.C.30/812,

6. KUNJU KUTTAN, DO. DO.

7. SUDHAKSHINA, D/O. DO.

8. JAVAHAR, S/O. BAHULEYAN,

9. JAYARAM, S/O. BAHULEYAN, DO. DO.

10. KARTHIYANI, W/O. VELUNNI,

11. SOMASUNDAR, NEDUMPARAMBIL,

12. CHAKRAPANI, DO. DO.

13. PARVATHI, DO. DO.

14. SATHI, DO. DO.

15. BABU, DO. DO.

16. SANTHOSH, DO. DO.

17. UNNIKRISHNAN, DO. DO.

18. SHIBU, DO. DO.

19. JOTHI, D/O. VELUNNI, DO.

20. PRABHAKARAN, S/O. RAMAN VAIDIAR,

21. KUNJIKUTTAN, S/O. RAMAN VAIDIAR.

22. SUDAKSHINA, D/O. DO. DO.

For Petitioner :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

For Respondent :SRI.V.S.CHANDRASEKHARAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

Dated :09/04/2007

O R D E R

KURIAN JOSEPH & K.T. SANKARAN, JJ.

................................................................................... C.M. APPLN. Nos. 4663 of 2002 & 1560 OF 2005 AND I.A.Nos. 3201 & 3202 OF 2005 IN L.A.A. No. 994 OF 2002 ...................................................................................

Dated this the 9th April, 2007

O R D E R

Kurian Joseph, J:

Appeal is filed against the judgment and decree in L.A.R. No. 569 of 1994 on the file of the Prl. Sub Court, North Paravur. Against the relied on judgment in L.A.R.No. 513 of 1994, the State had filed L.A.A.No. 622 of 1997. It is brought to our notice that the said appeal has been dismissed. In that view, it is not necessary to entertain any of the applications filed in this appeal. Accordingly, the above applications are dismissed. KURIAN JOSEPH,

JUDGE.

K.T. SANKARAN,

JUDGE.

lk

KURIAN JOSEPH & K.T. SANKARAN, JJ.

................................................................................... L.A.A. No. 994 OF 2002 ...................................................................................

Dated this the 9th April, 2007



J U D G M E N T

Kurian Joseph, J:

in view of dismissal of the petition to condone delay in filing the appeal, the appeal is also dismissed. KURIAN JOSEPH,

JUDGE.

K.T. SANKARAN,

JUDGE.

lk KURIAN JOSEPH &

K.T. SANKARAN, JJ.

........................................................ L.A.A. No.994 OF 2002 .........................................................

Dated this the 9th April, 2007



J U D G M E N T


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.