Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

P. RAVEENDRAN versus STATE REPRESENTED BY STANDING COUNSEL

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


P. RAVEENDRAN v. STATE REPRESENTED BY STANDING COUNSEL - Bail Appl No. 191 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 751 (10 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 191 of 2007()

1. P. RAVEENDRAN,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE REPRESENTED BY STANDING COUNSEL,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.S.RAJEEV

For Respondent :SRI.S.SREEKUMAR,SC FOR CBI.

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :10/01/2007

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Bail Application No. 191 of 2007 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Dated, this the 10th day of January 2007

ORDER

Petitioner who is the first accused in Crime No. 39(S)/89 SPE and RC 40 (S)/89 CBI, Cochin for offences punishable under Sections 465, 466, 473, 474 read with Sec. 120 (B) of I.P.C. seeks his enlargement on bail.

2. He was facing trial in the case which was conducted before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam as C.C. 526/92. After trial of the case, it stood posted for 313 examination on 13-3-2006. But on that day and on subsequent days the petitioner was absent and his applications for excusing his absence were granted by the court. On 21-8-2006 when the case called the petitioner was absent and there was no representation also. Thereupon his bail was cancelled and non-bailable warrant of arrest was issued against the petitioner. He was arrested and produced before the court which dismissed his bail application filed as Crl.M.P. 37/07. It is thereafter that the petitioner preferred this application for bail.

3. In as much as the petitioner has stated that it was on account of his daughter's marriage that he was unable to appear B.A. 191/07 -:2:- before the court below and that he now undertakes that he shall participate in the rest of trial, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam and subject to such conditions which the court below may impose including one to ensure the continued presence of the petitioner during the trial of the case. This application is allowed as above. V. RAMKUMAR,

(JUDGE)

ani.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.