Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

INDIRA K,MARUTHU NINNA VILA VEEDU versus VIZHINJAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH (SPECIAL

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


INDIRA K,MARUTHU NINNA VILA VEEDU v. VIZHINJAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH (SPECIAL - WP(C) No. 12093 of 2007(M) [2007] RD-KL 7519 (11 April 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 12093 of 2007(M)

1. INDIRA K,MARUTHU NINNA VILA VEEDU,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. VIZHINJAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH (SPECIAL
... Respondent

2. THE KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

3. THE DISTRICT MEDICAL OFFICER,OFFICE OF

4. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE

For Petitioner :SRI.VADAKARA V.V.N.MENON

For Respondent :SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE

Dated :11/04/2007

O R D E R

PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J

W.P.(C) .12093 OF 2007

Dated this the 11th day of April, 2007



JUDGMENT

I do not propose to go into the merits of the matter. It is somewhat apparent that Ext.P2 submitted by the petitioner is pending before the panchayat. Ext.P3 submitted by the petitioner before the Pollution Control Board is also pending.

2. The writ petition will stand disposed of directing the 1st respondent panchayat to take up Ext.P2 and consider the same in the light of the various grounds raised therein and in this writ petition and take a decision within three weeks of receiving a copy of this judgment.

3. Similarly, there will be a direction to the 2nd respondent Pollution Control Board to consider Ext.P3 and take a decision thereon at the earliest, at any rate, within three weeks of receiving a copy of this W.P.(C) .12093 OF 2007 judgment. Till such time a decision, as directed above, is taken by the panchayat on Ext.P2 and communicated to the petitioner, the respondents will not interfere with the smooth conduct of the poultry farm by the petitioner. Sd/- PIUS C. KURIAKOSE

(JUDGE)

sk1/- //true copy// P.S. to Judge. W.P.(C) .12093 OF 2007

PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J

W.P.(C) .12093 OF 2007

JUDGMENT

11th April, 2007


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.