Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KUNHIRAMAN.K., 52 YEARS versus STATE OF KERALA REP.BY INSPECTOR OF

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


KUNHIRAMAN.K., 52 YEARS v. STATE OF KERALA REP.BY INSPECTOR OF - Bail Appl No. 2125 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 7673 (12 April 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 2125 of 2007()

1. KUNHIRAMAN.K., 52 YEARS,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA REP.BY INSPECTOR OF
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.T.B.SHAJIMON

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :12/04/2007

O R D E R

V.RAMKUMAR, J.

Bail Application No. 2125/2007 Dated this 12th day of April, 2007

O R D E R

The petitioner who is the husband of one Leela, who is the defacto complainant in this case, seeks anticipatory bail. The petitioner is the first accused in Crime No.307/2006 of Neeleshwar police station for an offence punishable under sections 498-A IPC.

2. The marriage between the petitioner and the said Leela was in the year 1978. Three children have also been born in that wedlock. It is alleged that the petitioner has subsequently contracted another marriage on 23.11.2003 with another lady by name Thambayi(A2).

3. Having regard to the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the Investigating Officer to release the petitioner on bail for a period of one month in the event of his arrest in connection with the above case on his executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction to the Investigating officer and subject to the following conditions: B.A.2125/2007 2

(a). Petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

(b). The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

(c). The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

(d). Petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

(e). Petitioner shall surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail in the meanwhile.

4. If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. The application is allowed as above. V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE

mrcs B.A.2125/2007 3


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.