Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

PAIKKATTU MAMMED KOYA HAJI versus PUTHIYA MALIYAKKAL NAFEESABI

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


PAIKKATTU MAMMED KOYA HAJI v. PUTHIYA MALIYAKKAL NAFEESABI - WP(C) No. 19447 of 2006(M) [2007] RD-KL 7707 (12 April 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 19447 of 2006(M)

1. PAIKKATTU MAMMED KOYA HAJI,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. PUTHIYA MALIYAKKAL NAFEESABI,
... Respondent

2. ASSARI THODUKAYIL SAKEENA,

3. SAHINA, D/O. MOIDEENKUNHI,

4. SHAFANA,D/O.MOIDEENKUNHI,

For Petitioner :SRI.K.V.SOHAN

For Respondent :SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.P.BALACHANDRAN

Dated :12/04/2007

O R D E R

K.P.BALACHANDRAN, J.

W.P. (C ) No. 19447 of 2007

Dated this the 12th day of April, 2007.



JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed challenging Ext.P3 order passed by the Sub Judge, Kozhikode directing the maintainability of the suit being heard as a preliminary point. It is vehemently contended before me by the counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff that in order to have the maintainability of the suit heard as a preliminary point a contention regarding the maintainability of the suit should have been raised by the defendants in the written statement and an issue also should have been raised as regards the maintainability of the suit. The counsel for the respondents supports Ext.P3 order posting the case for preliminary hearing on the question of maintainability of the suit and submits that contention regarding maintainability of the suit is raised in the written statement and on the basis thereof an issue as to the maintainability of the suit is also raised in the suit.

2. The petitioner/plaintiff has no right to contend that issue regarding the maintainability of the suit shall not be heard as a preliminary issue but the trial has to be conducted and then only the question as to maintainability can be considered. Of course, if the trial court feels that the maintainability of the suit is a matter which according to him cannot be considered as a preliminary issue and deserves to be considered only at a latter stage, the trial court can defer the matter to be considered at a subsequent stage. But all the same, when the trial court decides to have the maintainability of the suit being heard as a preliminary issue the plaintiff cannot insist or dictate that only after trial the matter can be considered. This writ petition, in the circumstances, is devoid of merit and is dismissed.

(K.P.BALACHANDRAN, JUDGE)

ma


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.