Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ACHUTHAN PILLAI, AGED 70 YEARS versus SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


ACHUTHAN PILLAI, AGED 70 YEARS v. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE - Bail Appl No. 1968 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 7769 (13 April 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 1968 of 2007()

1. ACHUTHAN PILLAI, AGED 70 YEARS,
... Petitioner

2. SUSEELA, W/O.ACHUTHAN PILLAI,

Vs

1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
... Respondent

2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,

3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

For Petitioner :SRI.P.SREEKUMAR

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :13/04/2007

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

```````````````````````````````````````````````````` B.A. No. 1968 OF 2007 ````````````````````````````````````````````````````

Dated this the 13th day of April, 2007

O R D E R

In this Petition filed under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioners, who are the father-in-law and mother-in-law of Sunitha Rajesh, who is the defacto complainant, seek anticipatory bail. They are accused Nos.2 and 3 in Crime No.76/07 of Koramangala Police Station for an offence punishable under Sec.498A I.P.C.

2. According to the petitioners, they apprehend arrest at the instance of the said Sunitha Rajesh.

3. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. Having regard to the averments in the petition, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, a direction is issued to the police officer to release the petitioners on bail for a period of one month in the event of their arrest within the territory of Kerala in connection with the above case on each of them executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and subject to the following conditions: BA.1968/07

a. 1st petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11

a.m. on all Wednesdays.

b. Petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

c. Petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

d. Petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail.

e. Petitioners shall surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail in the meanwhile. If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to them shall be liable to be cancelled. This application is allowed as above.

(V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE)

aks


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.