Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SATHEESHKUMAR, S/O. BHASKARAN versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SATHEESHKUMAR, S/O. BHASKARAN v. STATE OF KERALA - Bail Appl No. 2271 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 7853 (13 April 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 2271 of 2007()

1. SATHEESHKUMAR, S/O. BHASKARAN,
... Petitioner

2. SREELAL @ KANNAN, S/O. SOMANKANI,

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :13/04/2007

O R D E R

V.RAMKUMAR, J.

Bail Application No. 2271/2007 Dated this 13th day of April, 2007

O R D E R

The petitioners who are accused Nos. 1 and 2 in Crime No.75/2007 of Palode Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 302 IPC, seek their enlargement on bail.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 4.3.2007 at about 10.00 p.m, the petitioners had assaulted the deceased Aji by kicking and beating him with a cudgel and Aji succumbed to the injuries at about 5.30 a.m on 5.3.2007. The learned Public Prosecutor also submitted that there was 33 injuries on the body of the deceased.

4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the duration of the judicial custody of the petitioners and the present stage of the investigation, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioners but only from a future date. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail with effect from 25.4.2007, on each of them executing a bond for Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for B.A.2271/2007 2 the like amount to the satisfaction of the J.F.C.M-I, Nedumangadu and subject to the following conditions:

(a). The petitioners shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11

a.m. on all Wednesdays.

(b). The petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation as and when required by the police till the filing of the final report.

(c). The petitioners shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall they attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

(d). The petitioners shall not commit any offence while on bail.

5. If the petitioners commit breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to them shall be liable to be cancelled. The application is allowed as above. V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE

mrcs B.A.2271/2007 3


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.