Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SUNIL JOSE,S/O.JOSE,AGED 31 YEARS versus STATE OF KERALA (S.H.O ULIKKAL POLICE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SUNIL JOSE,S/O.JOSE,AGED 31 YEARS v. STATE OF KERALA (S.H.O ULIKKAL POLICE - Bail Appl No. 2254 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 7872 (13 April 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 2254 of 2007()

1. SUNIL JOSE,S/O.JOSE,AGED 31 YEARS,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA (S.H.O ULIKKAL POLICE
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.P.P.RAMACHANDRAN

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :13/04/2007

O R D E R

V.RAMKUMAR, J.

Bail Application No. 2254/2007 Dated this 13th day of April, 2007

O R D E R

The petitioner who is the third accused in Crime No.67/2005 of Ulikkal Police station for an offence punishable under Section 8(2) of the Abkari Act for allegedly transporting 450 litres of Karnataka arrack in 4500 packets on 1.7.2005, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Consequent on the non-appearance of the petitioner in C.P.14/2007 on the file of the J.F.C.M, Mattannur, non bailable warrants of arrest are pending against the petitioner. Such being the position, I am not inclined to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction by granting anticipatory bail. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Magistrate and seek regular bail.

3. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the Committal Court and files an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of, preferably on the same day on which it is filed, B.A.2254/2007 2 after examining the explanation offered by the petitioner for his previous non appearance and also bearing in mind the decision reported in Sukumari v. State of Kerala (2001 (1) KLT 22). The application is disposed of as above. V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE

mrcs


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.