Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SURESH KUMAR SINGAL versus STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SURESH KUMAR SINGAL v. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE - Bail Appl No. 206 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 800 (10 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 206 of 2007()

1. SURESH KUMAR SINGAL,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE
... Respondent

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

For Petitioner :SRI.SAIBY JOSE KIDANGOOR

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :10/01/2007

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

Bail Application No. 206 of 2007

DATED: 10th January, 2007

O R D E R

Petitioner who is the Ist accused in Crime No. 610/1998 of the Central Police Station, Ernakulam for offences punishable under Sections 78 and 79 of of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 157 Section 13 of the Copyright Act, 1957 and Sec. 420, 486, 587 and 488 of I.P.C., seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The petitioner was granted bail during the crime stage. After the filing of the charge-sheet the case was registered as C.C. 238/2000 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam. Eventhough the petitioner, responding to the summons had appeared before that court, subsequently he failed to appear and consequently non-bailable warrant of arrest was issued against him after cancelling his bail bond. It is at this stage hat the petitioner has approached this court by filing this application.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. In as much as non-bailable warrant of arrest are pending against the petitioner, anticipatory bail cannot be granted to nullify the process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam and files an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of preferably on the same date on which it is filed after examining the explanation offered by the petitioner for his previous non-appearance. With the above observation this application is disposed of.

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

ani


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.