Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ABDULLA KUNHI @ KUNHABDULLA versus STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


ABDULLA KUNHI @ KUNHABDULLA v. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE - Bail Appl No. 3021 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 8245 (23 May 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 3021 of 2007()

1. ABDULLA KUNHI @ KUNHABDULLA,
... Petitioner

2. NAZAR.B., S/O.ABDULLA,

3. MUSTHAFA.B., -DO-.

4. SIRAJ, S/O.B.HUSSAIN, -DO-.

5. BASHEER, S/O.ABOOBACKER,

6. ILLYAS, -DO-.

7. ARAFATH, -DO-.

8. NOUSHAD, S/O.SHEIKKU,

9. MAJEED, S/O.ABOOBACKER,

10. ABID, S/O.B.K.MUSTAFA ILLYAS,

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.SUBHASH CYRIAC

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :23/05/2007

O R D E R

V.RAMKUMAR, J.

Bail Application No.3021 /2007 Dated this 23rd day of May, 2007

O R D E R

Petitioners who are accused Nos. 1 to 10 in Crime No.173/2007 of Bekkal Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 324, 308 read with section 149 I.P.C., seek anticipatory bail. The occurrence took place on 30.4.2007 at 10 p.m.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application.

3. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. But at the same time, I am inclined to permit the petitioners to surrender before the Investigating Officer for the purpose of interrogation and then to have their applications for bail considered by the Magistrate having jurisdiction. Accordingly, the petitioners shall surrender before the investigating officer on any day between 29-5-2007 and 31-5-2007 for the purpose of interrogation and recovery of incriminating material, if any. The petitioners shall thereafter B.A.NO.3021/2007 -2- be produced on the same day before the Magistrate who shall consider their applications for regular bail preferably on the same date on which such applications are filed. This petition is disposed of as above.

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

css/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.