Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

K.T.KURUVILA SON versus M/S. GEO PAUL & COMPANY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


K.T.KURUVILA SON v. M/S. GEO PAUL & COMPANY - WA No. 971 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 8288 (23 May 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WA No. 971 of 2007()

1. K.T.KURUVILA SON,
... Petitioner

2. K.N.MATHEW SONS,

Vs

1. M/S. GEO PAUL & COMPANY,
... Respondent

2. ELSY PAUL,

3. MARYKUNJU JOSE, W/O. C.P.JOSEPH,

4. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

5. THE DRUGS CONTROLLER OF KERALA,

6. THE ASSISTANT DRUGS CONTROLLER,

7. THE ASSISTANT DRUGS CONTROLLER,

8. THE DRUGS INSPECTOR,

9. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,

10. THE INDIAN DRUG MANUFACTURERS

11. ALL KERALA CHEMISTS & DRUGGISTS

12. A.N.MOHAN,

13. T.RAVINDRAN,

14. K.I.SUNNY,

15. A.G.MURALI,

16. ARISTO PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD.,

17. THE CANNANORE DRUG CENTRE,

18. J.S.PHARMA,

19. RAPTAKOS BRETT & CO. LTD.,

20. WOCKHARDT LIMITED,

21. LEO ENTERPRISES,

22. VIRBAC ANIMAL HEALTH (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,

23. RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD.,

24. GUFIC BIOSCIENCES LTD.,

25. DEVI DRUG LINES,

26. NICHOLAS PIRAMAL INDIA LIMITED,

27. NANDA MARKETING COMPANY,

For Petitioner :SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

Dated :23/05/2007

O R D E R

H.L.Dattu,C.J. & K.T.Sankaran,J.

W.A.No.971 of 2007

Dated, this the 23rd day of May, 2007



JUDGMENT

H.L.Dattu,C.J. Some of the respondents in W.P.(C).No.33190 of 2006 are the appellants in this appeal. They are calling in question the correctness or otherwise of the interim order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 2nd February, 2007. By way of an interim measure, the learned Single Judge has tried to protect the wholesale distributors of the drugs. To give such a protection, the learned Single Judge has made certain observations in the course of the order.

2. In our view, at this stage it may not be proper for us to interfere with the interim measure/interim order passed by the learned Single Judge. Therefore, we do not intend to entertain this Writ Appeal. Accordingly, the appeal requires to be disposed of. However, liberty requires to be granted to the appellants to make an appropriate request before the learned Single Judge for hearing of the writ petition out of turn. If such a W.A.No.971 of 2007 - 2 - request is made, learned Judge is requested to consider the same. All other contentions of both parties are left open. Ordered accordingly. H.L.Dattu Chief Justice K.T.Sankaran Judge vku/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.