Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

V.R.JAIMON @ KUNJUMON versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


V.R.JAIMON @ KUNJUMON v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - Bail Appl No. 2731 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 8386 (23 May 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 2731 of 2007()

1. V.R.JAIMON @ KUNJUMON,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.LIJI.J.VADAKEDOM

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :23/05/2007

O R D E R

V.RAMKUMAR, J.

Bail Application No. 2731/2007 Dated this 23rd day of May, 2007

O R D E R

The petitioner who is the first accused in C.R.No.11/2007 of Mallappally Excise Range for an offence punishable under Section 8(2) of the Abkari Act for allegedly having been found in possession of five litres of toddy adulterated with arrack on 21.4.2007 and who was arrested on the same day seeks his enlargement on bail.

2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. Having regard to the nature of the offences, the duration of judicial custody of the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner but from a future date. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail with effect from 28.5.2007, on his executing a bond for Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the J.F.C.M, Thiruvalla and subject to the following conditions: B.A.2731/2007 2

(a). Petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11

a.m. on all Wednesdays.

(b). The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the police.

(c). The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

(d). The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

4. If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. The application is allowed as above. V.RAMKUMAR,

JUDGE

mrcs B.A.2731/2007 3


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.