Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

PUSHPALATHA A.M., AGED 35 YEARS versus THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


PUSHPALATHA A.M., AGED 35 YEARS v. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION - WP(C) No. 15702 of 2007(T) [2007] RD-KL 8487 (24 May 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 15702 of 2007(T)

1. PUSHPALATHA A.M., AGED 35 YEARS,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION,
... Respondent

2. THE PRINCIPAL,

3. STATE OF KERALA - REPRESENTED BY

For Petitioner :SRI.M.SASINDRAN

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER

Dated :24/05/2007

O R D E R

A.K. BASHEER, J.

W.P.(C). NO. 15702 OF 2007

Dated this the 24th day of May, 2007



J U D G M E N T

Petitioner had availed of leave without allowance to pursue her study for B.Ed. Course. Leave was sanctioned and thereafter on completion of her studies she had rejoined duty and she was given her service benefits reckoning the period of leave without allowance as eligible leave for all such benefits. However, an objection has been raised by the Audit Department stating that petitioner would not be entitled to get the service benefits for the period availed of by her as leave without allowance to pursue her studies. Learned counsel submits that the issue is squarely covered in favour of the petitioner in view of the judgment of this Court in W.P.(C). No.26782/05 as well as in Deepika v. State of Kerala [2007 (1) KLT 71]. The grievance of the petitioner is that the impugned order has been issued without adverting to the dictum laid down by this Court in the above two judgments. In the above facts and circumstances, Exts. P4 & P7 are quashed to the extent they relate to the petitioner. The 1st WPC NO.15702/07 2 respondent shall reconsider matter in the light of the two judgments referred to above. This shall be done as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment after affording sufficient opportunity to the petitioner to be heard. Till such time a final decision is taken, Exts. P4 & P7 shall be kept in abeyance. Petitioner shall produce a certified copy of this judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the 1st respondent for compliance.

A.K. BASHEER, JUDGE

vps WPC NO.15702/07 3

A.K. BASHEER, JUDGE

OP NO.20954/00

JUDGMENT

1ST MARCH, 2007


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.