Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

JOBY, S/O. WILLIAMS, AGED 39 YEARS versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


JOBY, S/O. WILLIAMS, AGED 39 YEARS v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - Crl MC No. 1427 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 8724 (28 May 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 1427 of 2007()

1. JOBY, S/O. WILLIAMS, AGED 39 YEARS,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.T.K.AJITHKUMAR (VALATH)

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :28/05/2007

O R D E R

R.BASANT, J

Crl.M.C.No.1427 of 2007

Dated this the 28th day of May, 2007

ORDER

The petitioner faces allegations, inter alia, under the provisions of the Prevention of Destruction of Public Property Act. All the other accused have been tried, found not guilty and acquitted. Against the petitioner, proceedings have been initiated under Sections 82 and 83 Cr.P.C. He finds himself facing the unenviable predicament of a warrant of arrest issued by the learned Magistrate chasing.

2. The petitioner submits that his inability to appear earlier was not wilful and was on account of reasons beyond his control. He is willing to surrender before the learned Magistrate, but apprehends that his bail application may not be considered by the learned Magistrate on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously. He therefore prays that appropriate directions may be issued under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

2. It is for the petitioner to appear before the learned Magistrate and explain to the learned Magistrate the circumstances under which he could not earlier appear before the learned Magistrate. I have no reason to assume that the learned Magistrate would not consider such application on merits, in accordance with law and expeditiously. Every court must do the same. No special or Crl.M.C.No.1427 of 2007 2 specific direction appears to be necessary. Sufficient general directions have already been issued in Alice George v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police [2003(1) KLT 339].

3. This Crl.M.C is, in these circumstances, dismissed. But with the specific observation that if the petitioner appears before the learned Magistrate and applies for bail after giving sufficient prior notice to the Prosecutor in charge of the case, the learned Magistrate must proceed to pass appropriate orders on merits and expeditiously - on the date of surrender itself.

4. Hand over a copy of this order to the learned counsel for the petitioner.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)

rtr/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.