Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

P.JAYAPRAKASH, POSTAL ASSISTANT(BCR) versus MERVIN ALEXANDER

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


P.JAYAPRAKASH, POSTAL ASSISTANT(BCR) v. MERVIN ALEXANDER - Con Case(C) No. 574 of 2007(S) [2007] RD-KL 9047 (30 May 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Con Case(C) No. 574 of 2007(S)

1. P.JAYAPRAKASH, POSTAL ASSISTANT(BCR),
... Petitioner

Vs

1. MERVIN ALEXANDER,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.A.RAJASIMHAN

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

Dated :30/05/2007

O R D E R

H.L. DATTU, C.J. & K.T. SANKARAN, J.

C.O.C.No.574 of 2007

Dated this the 30th day of May, 2007



JUDGMENT

H.L. DATTU, C.J. Alleging that the respondents have wilfully and deliberately disobeyed the directions and orders passed by this court in W.P.(C)No.20792/06 dated 6th November, 2006, the petitioner is before us in this petition filed under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India inter alia requesting us to initiate appropriate contempt proceedings against the respondents.

2. The respondents are served with copies of the contempt petition and they have entered appearance through learned counsel.

3. The respondents have filed a counter affidavit before this court. In that, they have stated on oath that they have complied with the orders and directions issued by this court, by disposing of the application filed by the petitioner for permission to retire from service voluntarily.

4. Having gone through the pleadings in the contempt petition, the orders passed by this court and the counter affidavit filed by the respondents, we are of the opinion that the respondents have substantially complied with the orders and directions issued by this court. In our view, there is neither wilful nor deliberate disobedience of the orders and directions issued by this court. Accordingly, the cognizance of this contempt petition need not be taken. Accordingly, it is dropped. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner, if he so desires, to question the orders that has been passed by the respondents on the application filed by the petitioner. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- H.L. DATTU, CHIEF JUSTICE. Sd/- K.T. SANKARAN,

JUDGE.

Sk/ //true copy// P.S. To Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.