High Court of Kerala
Case Law Search
JANAKI v. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NENMARA - Crl MC No. 3390 of 2006  RD-KL 91 (2 January 2007)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMCrl MC No. 3390 of 2006()
1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NENMARA.
2. ARUMUKHAN, S/O.PAZHANIMALA,
3. MOHANAN, S/O.MANI,
4. CHELLAN, S/O.KUPPELAN,
6. UDHAYAN, S/O.CHAMAYI,
7. MURUKAN, S/O.KASU,
8. VINU, S/O.KASU,
9. UNNIKRISHNAN, S/O.KARUMAN,
10. KRISHNANKUTTY, S/O.CHELLAPPAN,
11. UNNIDEVAN, S/O.KRISHNAN,
13. FIROZ @ BIJOY,
14. VINU, S/O.KRISHNANKUTTY,
15. SHIBU, S/O.VELAYUDHAN,
17. STATE OF KERALA,
For Petitioner :SRI.P.SANTHALINGAM
For Respondent :SRI.C.P.PEETHAMBARAN
The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT
O R D E R
R.BASANT, JCrl.M.C.No.3390 of 2006
Dated this the 2nd day of January, 2007
ORDERThe grievance of the petitioner/complainant is that C.C.No.323 of 2002 and C.C.No.412 of 2005 pending before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Alathur are not being taken up for disposal together. There is reason to direct joint trial/consolidation of the charges, it is submitted. Report of the learned Magistrate was called for. The learned Magistrate reports that no such application has been filed by anyone for joint trial/consolidation of charges.
2. Faced with that situation, the learned counsel for the petitioner only prays that the petitioner may be permitted to file a proper application seeking the said relief before the learned Magistrate. I am satisfied that the said request can be allowed.
3. In the result, this Crl.M.C is, dismissed, but with the observation that the petitioner shall be at liberty to seek appropriate relief from the learned Magistrate, who shall pass appropriate orders on merits after considering the rival contentions.
(R.BASANT, JUDGE)rtr/- 2
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.