Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

VINOD, S/O. VASU, AGED 28 YEARS versus STATE OF KERALA, (S.H.O. PUTHUNAGARAM

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


VINOD, S/O. VASU, AGED 28 YEARS v. STATE OF KERALA, (S.H.O. PUTHUNAGARAM - Bail Appl No. 117 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 913 (11 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 117 of 2007()

1. VINOD, S/O. VASU, AGED 28 YEARS,
... Petitioner

2. RAMADAS, S/O. THANKAVELU, AGED 40 YEARS,

3. RAGHU, S/O. KUNCHAN, AGED 25,

4. ARU, S/O. KOPPULLY, AGED 53 YEARS,

5. MOHANAN, S/O. MOTTA, AGED 32 YEARS,

6. RAJAN V.T., S/O. VELAYUDHAN MANNADIAR,

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, (S.H.O. PUTHUNAGARAM
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.SOJAN MICHEAL

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :11/01/2007

O R D E R

V.Ramkumar, J.


========================
B.A.No.117 of 2007
========================

Dated this the 11th day of January, 2007.

ORDER

Petitioners, who are accused Nos. 3,7,8 and 10 to 12 in Crime No.405 of 2006 of Puthunagaram Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341,323, 324 and 307 read with Section 149 I.P.C., seek anticipatory bail.

2. The occurrence took place at 9.30 p.m. on 27.12.2006 in which the de facto complainant had sustained one head injury and another injury on his shoulder. Weapons like sword and stick were used.

3. The learned public Prosecutor opposed the application.

4. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature. At the same time, I am inclined to give the petitioners an opportunity to surrender before the Investigating Officer and get their application for regular bail considered by the Magistrate. Accordingly, the petitioners shall surrender before the Investigating Officer any day between 15.1.2007 and 18.1.2007 for the purpose of interrogation. After interrogation, the petitioners shall be produced before the BA 117/07 -: 2 :- Magistrate on the same day. The Magistrate shall consider and dispose of the application, if any, filed by the petitioners for regular bail. Such consideration and disposal shall be done preferably on the same date on which such application for regular bail is filed. This petition is disposed of with the above direction. V.Ramkumar, Judge. ess 11/1


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.