Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

P.R.BALAN, AGED 76 S/O. RAVUNNI versus T.B.SUGATHAN, AGED 51

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


P.R.BALAN, AGED 76 S/O. RAVUNNI v. T.B.SUGATHAN, AGED 51 - CRL A No. 1038 of 2002 [2007] RD-KL 9162 (31 May 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

CRL A No. 1038 of 2002()

1. P.R.BALAN, AGED 76 S/O. RAVUNNI,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. T.B.SUGATHAN, AGED 51,
... Respondent

2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC

For Petitioner :SRI.M.RAVIKUMAR

For Respondent :SRI.M.C.JOHN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.THANKAPPAN

Dated :31/05/2007

O R D E R

K. Thankappan, J.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Crl.A.No. 1038 of 2002
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dated this the th 31st day of May, 2007



JUDGMENT

This is an appeal filed against the acquittal order passed in S.T. No. 2696/99 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of the First Class-I, Thrissur. By the impugned judgment the trial court acquitted the respondent on the ground that the appellant failed to establish that Ext.P6 cheque was issued in discharge of a debt or legally enforceable liability. The above finding is challenged in this appeal. During the pendency of the appeal, it is submitted that the case has been settled out of court. When the case came up for hearing today, learned counsel for the appellant submits that there is no intimation from the appellant. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that a compromise has been arrived at between the appellant and the respondent and he has produced a receipt to support his submission.

2. In the above circumstances, this Court takes an independent view and accept the submission of the learned counsel for the respondent that the matter has been settled out of court. Hence, the appeal stands dismissed confirming the judgment of the trial court. The receipt is treated as part of the records. K.Thankappan, Judge. mn.

K. Thankappan, J.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Crl.A.No. 1038 /2002
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Judgment 31-5-2007


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.