Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

THE ROYAL LINK, A FIRM, REPRESENTED BY versus THE MALABAR AND PIONEER HOSIERY (P)LTD.

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


THE ROYAL LINK, A FIRM, REPRESENTED BY v. THE MALABAR AND PIONEER HOSIERY (P)LTD. - RCRev No. 43 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 9424 (4 June 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

RCRev No. 43 of 2007()

1. THE ROYAL LINK, A FIRM, REPRESENTED BY
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE MALABAR AND PIONEER HOSIERY (P)LTD.,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.PHILIP ANTONY CHACKO

For Respondent :SRI.V.V.SURENDRAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice J.B.KOSHY The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.P.BALACHANDRAN

Dated :04/06/2007

O R D E R

J.B. KOSHY and K.P.BALACHANDRAN, JJ.

R.C.R. No. 43 of 2007

Dated this the 4th day of June, 2007

ORDER

Koshy, J.

An eviction petition was filed under section 11 (8) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). But, at the time of hearing, the claim was argued under section 11 (3) of the Act and rent control court rejected the application as director of the landlord company was not examined to prove bonafide. The case was argued before the appellate authority with regard to the need under section 11 (8) of the Act. The appellate authority remanded the matter even though the rent control court found that director ought to have been examined. Against the order of remand, this revision application is filed by the tenant. It is submitted by the landlord that there are rent arrears also which is denied by the tenant. On the facts and circumstances of the case and confusion regarding argument under section 11 (3) before the rent control court and under section 11 (8) before the appellate authority, we are of the view that this revision application can be disposed of setting aside the order of remand, but, closing the R.C.R.No.43/2007 2 matter without prejudice to the right of the landlord in filing a fresh application contending all grounds which are available at the time of filing the petition including grounds taken in the R.C.P. and if such a petition is filed tenant also can take all defences available to them. Revision petition is disposed of accordingly. J.B.KOSHY

JUDGE

K.P.BALACHANDRAN

JUDGE

vaa J.B. KOSHY AND

K.P.BALACHANDRAN, JJ.

R.C.R.NO.43/2007

ORDER

Dated:4th June, 2007


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.