Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

JACOB JOHN, AGED 48, S/O.K.C.JOHN versus THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


JACOB JOHN, AGED 48, S/O.K.C.JOHN v. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE - WP(C) No. 14883 of 2007(V) [2007] RD-KL 9565 (6 June 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 14883 of 2007(V)

1. JACOB JOHN, AGED 48, S/O.K.C.JOHN,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,
... Respondent

2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

3. HEAD LOAD WORKERS UNION(C.I.T.U.),

4. AMBALAPPUZHA TALUK POTHUMARAMATHU

For Petitioner :SRI.SUDHEENDRAN. K.Y.

For Respondent :SRI.K.BALACHANDRAN

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMAN The Hon'ble MRS. Justice K.HEMA

Dated :06/06/2007

O R D E R

P.R.RAMAN & K.HEMA, JJ.

W.P.(C).NO.14883 OF 2007

Dated this the 6th day of June,2007



JUDGMENT

Raman,J.

Petitioner has got two registered headload workers as evidenced by the identity cards, Ext.P2. He is a dealer of cement and hardwares. He is prepared to engage the registered headload workers, who are members of respondents 3 and 4 Unions, as and when he requires additional workmen for doing the loading and unloading work. The 3rd respondent would submit that they are not causing any obstruction to the work and the trouble started only when the petitioner denied them work. The petitioner submitted that he is prepared to engage such workers, as and when required any additional workmen for the loading and unloading works, from the members belonging to respondents 3 and 4 Unions. It is assured on their behalf that no obstruction will be caused. In spite of assurance, if the respondents 3 and 4 and their members cause any obstruction, the 2nd respondent-Circle Inspector of Police shall give necessary protection for the loading and unloading operation and for the smooth working of the W.P.(C).NO.14883/2007 petitioner's establishment, if a complaint is made by the petitioner alleging such obstruction. Writ Petition is disposed of as above. P.R.RAMAN, Judge. K.HEMA, Judge. kcv.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.