Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

M.BABU, VIJAYA AUTO SERVICES versus SOORYA KUMAR, S/O.SREEDHARAN

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


M.BABU, VIJAYA AUTO SERVICES v. SOORYA KUMAR, S/O.SREEDHARAN - Crl Rev Pet No. 1954 of 2007 [2007] RD-KL 9593 (6 June 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl Rev Pet No. 1954 of 2007()

1. M.BABU, VIJAYA AUTO SERVICES,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. SOORYA KUMAR, S/O.SREEDHARAN,
... Respondent

2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC

For Petitioner :SRI.M.V.AMARESAN

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.R.UDAYABHANU

Dated :06/06/2007

O R D E R

K.R. UDAYABHANU, J


=================================
CRL. R.P. NO. 1954 OF 2007 D
=================================

Dated this the 6th day of June 2007

O R D E R

The revision petitioner stands convicted for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced, as modified by the appellate court, to imprisonment till the rising of the court and to pay a compensation of Rs.1,60,000/- and in default to undergo simple imprisonment for three months.

2. The contention of the revision petitioner is that the evidence of PW1 is sufficient to rebut the statutory presumptions. The oral evidence of DW1 is that only a sum of Rs.35,000/- was borrowed by the revision petitioner and that he collected the amount from PW1 and handed over the same to the complainant and that the amount was repaid. Evidently no steps were taken to get back the blank cheque allegedly executed. I find that both the courts below have meticulously considered the evidence. In the circumstances and in view of the evidence of PW1 who was CRL.R.P. NO. 1954/2007 : 2 : proved the execution of the cheque, I find no reason to interfere in the findings of the courts below. The revision petition is dismissed in limine.

3. Considering the plea of the counsel for the revision petitioner, the revision petitioner is granted six months time from today onwards to pay the amount of compensation. He shall appear before Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Sulthan Bathery on 05.12.2007 to receive sentence.

K.R. UDAYABHANU, JUDGE.

rv CRL.R.P. NO. 1954/2007 : 3 :


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.