SREE NARAYANA TRADERS AND FINANCIERS LTD versus V.C.KRISHNAN ACHARI, USHA BHAVAN

High Court of Kerala

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

SREE NARAYANA TRADERS AND FINANCIERS LTD v. V.C.KRISHNAN ACHARI, USHA BHAVAN - OP No. 28485 of 2002(N) [2007] RD-KL 9665 (6 June 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

OP No. 28485 of 2002(N)

1. SREE NARAYANA TRADERS AND FINANCIERS LTD
... Petitioner

Vs

1. V.C.KRISHNAN ACHARI, USHA BHAVAN,
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.SUNIL JACOB JOSE

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE

Dated :06/06/2007

O R D E R

PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J.

.......................................................... O.P.No.28485 OF 2002 ...........................................................

DATED THIS THE 6TH JUNE, 2007

J U D G M E N T

It is reported by the Registry that the respondent is no more. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even though notice which was issued to the respondent has been returned with the endorsement that the respondent is no more, according to his information, the respondent is very much alive and kicking and is regularly appearing before the court below.

2. I do not propose to go into the above controversy. The fact remains that during the past five years the respondent has not been served and the proceedings in the court below are under stay. The petitioner-Company's claim is that the petitioner is a creditor of the respondent who has obtained decree in L.A.R.No.1 of 1993 on the file of the Sub Court, Pathanamthitta. According to the petitioner- Company, the Company has filed an application for attachment and even as the same is pending, the learned Sub Judge is executing the decree in the above L.A.R. and is going to disburse the amount under deposit to the respondent. The respondent who has obviously been informed about the passage of stay by this Court does not appear to be enthusiastic in entering appearance before this Court and get the  OP.N0.28485/02 stay vacated.

3. Under these circumstances, I am of the view that this Original Petition can be disposed of even without completing service on the respondent or his legal heirs, if he is no more as reported by the Registry. If no orders have so far been passed by the execution court in the application filed by the petitioner seeking attachment of the decree amount in L.A.R.1 of 1993, the court will pass orders on that application after hearing both sides at the earliest and at any rate within three weeks of receiving copy of this judgment. The court below will pass orders on the cheque application, if any, filed for withdrawal/disbursement of the amount under deposit, only after two weeks of passage of orders in the attachment application. The Original Petition is disposed of as above. No costs.

(PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE)

tgl  OP.N0.28485/02  OP.N0.28485/02 

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.