Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

P.M.XAVIER versus THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


P.M.XAVIER v. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD - WP(C) No. 28792 of 2006(C) [2007] RD-KL 987 (12 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 28792 of 2006(C)

1. P.M.XAVIER,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,
... Respondent

2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (HRM),

3. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER,

4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,

For Petitioner :SRI.N.SUGATHAN

For Respondent :SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.K.DENESAN

Dated :12/01/2007

O R D E R

K.K.DENESAN, J

W.P.(C)NO.28792 of 2006

Dated this the 12th day of January, 2007



JUDGMENT

The petitioner retired from the service of the Kerala State Electricity Board while working as Overseer. His grievance about the delay in according sanction for the retirement benefits stands redressed by the passing of Ext.P1 by the Chief Engineer on 6.12.2006. The petitioner has been sanctioned DCRG of Rs.2,69,490/= along with family pension, commutation value of pension and monthly pension. But except the monthly pension, he has not been paid the terminal benefits referred to in Ext.P10. Legal Laision Officer for the respondents submits that whatever amounts are pending payment will be disbursed within six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The submission is recorded and an order to that effect is passed.

2. One grievance that remains to be redressed is the claim made by the petitioner for computing terminal benefits taking into account the service rendered by him in the Cochin Electrical Company which is the predecessor institution of the Kerala State Electricity Board. The petitioner places reliance on Ext.P11 Government order dated W.P.(C)No. 28792/2006 2 3.11.1989, wherein it is stated that the service period of those who had worked in the Cochin Electrical Company and whose services were by the Kerala State Electricity Board will be entitled to count the period of service for the Cochin Electrical Company also. This claim has been made by the petitioner by filing Ext.P12 representation before the second respondent Chief Engineer. Hence, there shall be an order directing the second respondent to consider Ext.P12 in the light of Ext.P11 Government order and any other order on the subject and take appropriate decision within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. If the second respondent decides to reckon the service rendered by the petitioner in the Cochin Electrical Company, the terminal benefits shall be recomputed and whatever monthly benefits payable to the petitioner shall be made available to him without further delay.

K.K.DENESAN, JUDGE

css/ W.P.(C)No. 28792/2006 3


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.