Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

J.BALAYYAN, S/O JAMES NADAR versus STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


J.BALAYYAN, S/O JAMES NADAR v. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE - WP(C) No. 12254 of 2007(H) [2007] RD-KL 9985 (11 June 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 12254 of 2007(H)

1. J.BALAYYAN, S/O JAMES NADAR,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
... Respondent

2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE

3. THE SPECIAL SALE OFFICER,

4. TRIVANDRUM CO-OPERATIVE AGRICULTURAL

5. THE MANAGER, TRIVANDRUM AGRICULTURAL

For Petitioner :SRI.ABRAHAM MATHEW (VETTOOR)

For Respondent :SRI.D.KISHORE

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH

Dated :11/06/2007

O R D E R

K.M.JOSEPH, J.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W.P.(C).No. 12254 OF 2007
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dated this the 11th day of June, 2007



JUDGMENT

Petitioner challenges Ext.P5. By Ext.P5, the respondent bank has informed the petitioner that the sale of the mortgaged property was confirmed by the Joint Registrar and there is no question of consideration of the application of the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the Bank submits that if the petitioner remits Rs. 52,542/- in lump including the expense, if it is not included in the amount of Rs. 52,542/-, the respondent bank will re-convey the property.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is ready and willing to pay the said amount. Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 4th respondent bank to re-convey the property of the petitioner WPC No.12254/07 2 sold and purchased by the fourth respondent bank and covered by Ext.R4(d). upon the petitioner remitting a sum of Rs. 52,542/- and also meeting the expense for re-conveyance, if the amount of RS. 52,542/- does not include the expenses of re-conveyance. This direction will be complied only if the petitioner remits the amount within one month from today.

(K.M.JOSEPH, JUDGE)

sv. WPC No.12254/07 3


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.