High Court of Rajasthan
Case Law Search
SUKHVINDER KAUR v STATE & ORS - CW Case No. 4344 of 2002  RD-RJ 108 (3 August 2004)
Date of Order : 03-08-2004
HON'BLE MR. N.P.GUPTA,J.
Mr.Sudhir Sharma , for the petitioner.
Mr.B.N.Kalla , for respondent no.3.
Mr.L.R.Upadhyay , Dy.G.A.
Impugned order has been passed by the Nayab Tehsildar under Sec. 22 of the
Rajasthan Colonisation Act, treating the petitioner to be trespasser . The petitioner claims that he cannot be said to be trespasser for variety of reasons, intended to be submitted before this court.
In my view, whatever be the case of the petitioner on merit about being not trespasser, he may have remedies under the Rajasthan Colonisation Act, or any other law, to establish that he is not trespasser, but then since on the face of it, order of Tehsildar is appealable. I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition. Same is, therefore, dismissed summarily.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.