SUKHVINDER KAUR versus STATE & ORS

High Court of Rajasthan

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

SUKHVINDER KAUR v STATE & ORS - CW Case No. 4344 of 2002 [2004] RD-RJ 108 (3 August 2004)

50 S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.4344/2002

Date of Order : 03-08-2004

HON'BLE MR. N.P.GUPTA,J.

Mr.Sudhir Sharma , for the petitioner.

Mr.B.N.Kalla , for respondent no.3.

Mr.L.R.Upadhyay , Dy.G.A.

Impugned order has been passed by the Nayab Tehsildar under Sec. 22 of the

Rajasthan Colonisation Act, treating the petitioner to be trespasser . The petitioner claims that he cannot be said to be trespasser for variety of reasons, intended to be submitted before this court.

In my view, whatever be the case of the petitioner on merit about being not trespasser, he may have remedies under the Rajasthan Colonisation Act, or any other law, to establish that he is not trespasser, but then since on the face of it, order of Tehsildar is appealable. I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition. Same is, therefore, dismissed summarily.

(N.P.GUPTA),J.

Srawat/-

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.