CHANAN RAM & ORS. versus BOARD OF REVENUE FOR RAJ. & ORS.

High Court of Rajasthan

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

CHANAN RAM & ORS. v BOARD OF REVENUE FOR RAJ. & ORS. - CW Case No. 3024 of 2004 [2004] RD-RJ 113 (4 August 2004)

S. B. C. W. P. NO.3024/2004

(Chanan Ram & Ors. Vs. B.O.R. & Ors.)

DATE OF ORDER : 04.08.2004

HON'BLE SHRI N.P.GUPTA,J.

Mr.R.S.Chundawat for the petitioner.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

I do not find any sufficient ground to interfere with the findings of fact recorded by the learned Courts below, to the effect, that the allotment was, as a matter of fact, made jointly in favour of Gopiram and Nandram, as the application was jointly filed, and was bearing photograph of both the persons. In that view of the matter, it cannot be said that the land was allotted to Gopiram alone, and the name of Nandram was wrongly entered.

The writ petition thus, has no force, and is hereby dismissed summarily.

(N.P.GUPTA),J.

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.