MISS.SUCHITRA PANWAR versus STATE & ORS.

High Court of Rajasthan

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

MISS.SUCHITRA PANWAR v STATE & ORS. - CW Case No. 2845 of 2004 [2004] RD-RJ 141 (9 August 2004)

S. B. C. W. P. NO.2845/2004

(Miss Suchitra Panwar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.)

DATE OF ORDER : 09.08.2004

HON'BLE SHRI N.P.GUPTA,J.

Mr.M.S.Purohit for the petitioner.

Mr.Himanshu Shrimali }

Mr.D.S.Rajvi } for the respondents.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

The challenge of the petitioner is that some candidates, who had already been given admission in MBBS/BDS were again considered for counseling for admission to BVSC and AH, and on that account, the petitioner could not get admission, while such persons could not be considered in the counseling.

Admittedly, none of those persons have been impleaded as party respondents, who obviously will have to be uprooted, in case the petitioner's contention is accepted. As such, the writ petition cannot be said to be properly constituted for want of necessary parties. The same is, therefore, dismissed summarily.

(N.P.GUPTA),J. tarun

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.