JARNAIL SINGH & ANR versus STATE

High Court of Rajasthan

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

JARNAIL SINGH & ANR v STATE - CRLMB Case No. 3618 of 2004 [2004] RD-RJ 539 (3 November 2004)

S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail Application No.3618/2004 03.11.2004

HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J.

Mr. R.S. Gill, for the petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, Public Prosecutor.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor for the State. Perused the impugned order and challan papers.

There is only one eye witness Kesar Singh who failed to identify the petitioners in identification parade held on 28.6.2004.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail.

Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec. 439

Cr.P.C. is allowed and the petitioners Jarnail Singh S/o

Shri Dogar Singh and Karnail Singh S/o Shri Dogar Singh be releasesd on bail in FIR No.105/2003, P.S. Sri Vijay Nagar, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of

Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each with two sound and solvant sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

(H.R.PANWAR),J. /skm/

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.