Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DINESH & ORS versus STATE

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


DINESH & ORS v STATE - CRLMB Case No. 341 of 2005 [2005] RD-RJ 263 (29 January 2005)

S.B.Criminal Misc. Bail Appl. NO.341/2005

Date of order : 29.1.2005

HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR,J.

Mr. Mridul Jain, for the petitioners.

Mr. Ashok Upadhyaya, Public Prosecutor.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Public

Prosecutor. Perused the order impugned as well as the police investigation diary. I have carefully gone through the statement of Ramchandra recorded under section 161 Cr.P.C., who is said to be an eye-witness of the occurrence. He stated that the present petitioner and one Gulab slaughtered the cow and distributed its meat. Gulab was arrested by the police.

In view of the statement of the eye-witness, it cannot be said that the present petitioners are not involved in the alleged commission of crime.

In the circumstances, therefore, it is not a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. The bail application filed by petitioners under section 438 Cr.P.C. is, therefore, rejected.

(H.R.PANWAR),J. m.asif/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.