Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MOOOLARAM versus BABOOLAL & ORS

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


MOOOLARAM v BABOOLAL & ORS - CMA Case No. 277 of 2005 [2005] RD-RJ 567 (11 March 2005)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

--------------------------------------------------------

CIVIL MISC. APPEAL No. 277 of 2005

MOOOLARAM

V/S

BABOOLAL & ORS

Mr. DS SODA, for the appellant / petitioner

Date of Order : 11.3.2005

HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J.

ORDER

-----

Heard learned counsel for the appellant, and perused the impugned judgment.

It is contended by learned counsel for the appellant that the learned Tribunal was in error in deciding issue No.1, when it held that the appellant was guilty of contributory negligence in happening of the accident. Learned counsel read to me the finding of the learned trial Court. He has not been able to satisfy, as to how the finding requires any interference in the appeal. No other point was argued.

The appeal thus, has no force, and is dismissed summarily.

( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.