High Court of Rajasthan
Case Law Search
R S E B v HET RAM - SAC Case No. 162 of 2003  RD-RJ 64 (10 January 2005)
DB CIVIL SPL.APPEAL (W) No.162/2003
Date of Order: 10.01.05
HON'BLE THE ACTG.CHIEF JUSTICE MR.Y.R.MEENA
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR
Mr.Vijay Bishnoi for the appellant/s.
BY THE COURT:(PER HON.MR.Y.R.MEENA,ACTG.C.J.)-
In this appeal the controversy is that the appellant wants that all the three connections should be clubbed and the learned Single Judge found that all the three connections are given for different premises. The definition of the premises and the factual aspects have been considered by the learned
Single Judge in para 10 of his order in S.B.Civil
First Appeal No. 214/1999 dated 1st April,2002 and factually found that all the three premises are different. That we have upheld in DB Civil Spl.Appeal
Following our view in the DB Civil Special
Appeal we see no merit in this appeal.
This appeal also stands dismissed.
(GOVIND MATHUR),J. (Y.R.MEENA),ACTG.C.J.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.