R S E B versus HET RAM

High Court of Rajasthan

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

R S E B v HET RAM - SAC Case No. 162 of 2003 [2005] RD-RJ 64 (10 January 2005)

DB CIVIL SPL.APPEAL (W) No.162/2003

Date of Order: 10.01.05

HON'BLE THE ACTG.CHIEF JUSTICE MR.Y.R.MEENA

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR

Mr.Vijay Bishnoi for the appellant/s.

BY THE COURT:(PER HON.MR.Y.R.MEENA,ACTG.C.J.)-

In this appeal the controversy is that the appellant wants that all the three connections should be clubbed and the learned Single Judge found that all the three connections are given for different premises. The definition of the premises and the factual aspects have been considered by the learned

Single Judge in para 10 of his order in S.B.Civil

First Appeal No. 214/1999 dated 1st April,2002 and factually found that all the three premises are different. That we have upheld in DB Civil Spl.Appeal

No.161/2003.

Following our view in the DB Civil Special

No.161/2003,

Appeal we see no merit in this appeal.

This appeal also stands dismissed.

(GOVIND MATHUR),J. (Y.R.MEENA),ACTG.C.J.

L.George

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.