Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SMT.RAMI versus KISHANLAL

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SMT.RAMI v KISHANLAL - CMA Case No. 740 of 2004 [2005] RD-RJ 647 (18 March 2005)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

--------------------------------------------------------

CIVIL MISC. APPEAL No. 740 of 2004

SMT.RAMI

V/S

KISHANLAL

Mr. BASTICHAND, for the appellant / petitioner

Date of Order : 18.3.2005

HON'BLE SHRI N P GUPTA,J.

ORDER

-----

Heard learned counsel for the appellant, and perused the impugned order.

The learned trial Court has given cogent reasons for dismissing the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act for want of evidence, and in view of the fact, that a decree under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act for dissolution of marriage has already been passed, and learned counsel for the appellant on being pointedly asked, has not been able to satisfy that, that decree is not surviving any more. In that view of the matter, I do not find any sufficient ground to interfere with the impugned order.

The appeal is, therefore, dismissed summarily.

( N P GUPTA ),J. /tarun/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.