Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

STATE & ORS versus JOGENDRA SINGH

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


STATE & ORS v JOGENDRA SINGH - SAW Case No. 110 of 2005 [2005] RD-RJ 758 (4 April 2005)

D.B. CIVIL SPECIAL APPEAL NO.110/2005

(State of Raj. & Ors. vs. Jogendra Singh)

Date : 04.04.2005.

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.N.MATHUR

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANAK MOHTA

Mr.H.R. Soni, Addl. Government Advocate.

Mr.V.K. Mathur for

Mr.D.S. Rajvi, for the respondents.

We have heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the order of the learned Single Judge dated 08th May, 2003.

The learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition directing the appellant to pay the retiral benefits admissible to the respondent as per the Rules.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the appellant that as an appeal against the order of acquittal is pending, the respondent cannot be paid the retiral benefits.

In our view, simply because the appeal against the order of acquittal is pending before the appellate court, the respondent cannot be deprived for the retiral benefits.

No case is made out for interference with the order of the learned Single Judge.

The special appeal stands dismissed.

(MANAK MOHTA),J. (N.N.MATHUR),J ashwini/-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.