Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SUNYANA@VIMLA versus NARAYAN

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SUNYANA@VIMLA v NARAYAN - CMA Case No. 387 of 2003 [2006] RD-RJ 1004 (8 May 2006)

S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO. 387/2003

Date : 08.05.2006

HON'BLE MR. BHAGWATI PRASAD, J.

Mr. Shailendra Kala for the appellant.

Mr. Pankaj Sharma for the respondent. == = =

Heard.

The respondent is present. He was present even on the last date of hearing. The appellant has failed to appear despite being granted two opportunities. She appears to be not willing to co-operate with the Court. It is concluded that reconciliation is not possible. The matter will be heard on merits.

(BHAGWATI PRASAD), J. bjsh


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.