High Court of Rajasthan
Case Law Search
RAVI KUMAR v STATE - CRLAB Case No. 546 of 2006  RD-RJ 1183 (18 May 2006)
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail/Suspension of Sentence Application
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 467/2006
( Ravi Kumar Vs. State of Rajasthan)
Date of Order: May 18, 2006
HON'BLE MR. H.R. PANWAR, J.
Mr. N.L. Joshi, for the appellant-applicant.
Mr. JPS Chaudhary, Public Prosecutor for the State.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant-applicant and perused the judgment and order impugned.
Admit. Issue notice. Mr. JPS Chaudhary, Public
Prosecutor appearing for the State, accepts the notice.
Heard on the application for suspension of sentence.
Learned counsel for the appellant-applicant does not want to press the request for suspension of conviction, however, argued on the suspension of substantive sentence.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I think is just and proper to suspend the substantive sentence of imprisonment awarded to the appellant-applicant.
Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the substantive sentence of imprisonment passed by the Sessions Judge, Anti
Corruption Cases, Bikaner, vide judgment dated 5-5-2006 in
Sessions Prevention of Corruption Case No. 29/2002 against appellant-applicant Ravi Kumar S/o Jagdish Prasad, shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal, provided each of them executes a personal bond in the sum of
Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before this Court on 12-7-2006 and whenever ordered to do so with the incorporation in the bond that as and when he will shift his place of residence, he will intimate to this Court and his lawyer about his new place of residence.
(H.R. PANWAR), J. mcs
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.