Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

CHATARA & ORS. versus STATE

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


CHATARA & ORS. v STATE - CRLR Case No. 389 of 2006 [2006] RD-RJ 1193 (19 May 2006)

S.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 389/2006.

(CHATRA & ORS. VS. STATE)

DATE OF ORDER : 19.05.2006.

HON'BLE MR. H.R. PANWAR, J.

Mr. R..S. Chundawat for the petitioner/s.

Mr.JPS Chaudhary Public Prosecutor.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

The matter is at the defence evidence. The trial court itself has observed that it is open for the accused petitioner to summon any witness through Court, if they wish to examine in defence. It is now for the accused petitioners to move an application before the trial court if they wish to summon any of the doctors to examine C.T.Scan in question.

The order impugned does not suffer from any error, illegality or perversity warranting interference by this Court under revisional jurisdiction.

The revision petition is accordingly dismissed.

(H.R. PANWAR)J.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.