High Court of Rajasthan
Case Law Search
RADU v STATE - CRLAB Case No. 311 of 2006  RD-RJ 1328 (29 May 2006)
S.B.Cr.Misc. Bail App. No. 311/2006
S.B.CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 52/2006
(Radu Vs. State of Rajasthan)
Date of order : 29/05/2006
HON'BLE MR.H.R.PANWAR, J.
Mr. Rishi Vaishnav for the applicant-appellant.
Mr. J.P.S.Choudhary, Public Prosecutor.
Heard. Perused the judgment and order impugned and record of the trial court.
Admit. Issue notice.
Mr. J.P.S.Choudhary, P.P. accepts notice on behalf of State.
Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application for suspension of sentence.
Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, I think it just and proper to suspend the substantive sentence of imprisonment awarded to the accused appellant-applicant.
Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 389
Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the substantive sentence of imprisonment passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge,
Banswara Camp Kushalgarh vide judgment dt. 17.12.2005 in sessions case No.50/2003 against applicant -appellant Radu S/o
Meha shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before this court on 11/7/2006 and whenever ordered to do so with the incorporation in the bond that as and when he will shift his place of residence, he will intimate to this Court and his lawyer about his new place of residence.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.