Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DERAJ RAM & ORS. versus HANUMAN RAM & ANR.

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


DERAJ RAM & ORS. v HANUMAN RAM & ANR. - CR Case No. 350 of 2006 [2006] RD-RJ 1527 (11 July 2006)

S.B.Civil Revision Petition No.350/2006

Deraj Ram and others. vs.

Hanuman Ram and another.

Date : 11.7.2006

HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J.

Mr. Suresh Shrimali, for the petitioners.

-----

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

After going through the facts of the case and the detailed reasons given by the trial court, I do not find any reason to interfere in the order passed by the trial court on 20.5.2006 as the court below has not committed any error of jurisdiction or even error of law by rejecting the application filed by the petitioners under Order 7 Rule 11

CPC and furthermore because of the reason that the defendants have been given liberty to raise the objection in the written statement so that the issue raised by the defendants may be decided properly after framing the issues and at the time of decision of the suit.

Consequently, I do not find any merit in the revision petition and the same is hereby dismissed.

(PRAKASH TATIA), J.

S.Phophaliya


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.