High Court of Rajasthan
Case Law Search
SURESH DAS v STATE - CRLMB Case No. 2824 of 2006  RD-RJ 1571 (12 July 2006)
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.2824/2006
Date : 12.07.2006
HON'BLE MR.SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK, J.
Mr. Ramesh Purohit for the applicant.
Mr. V.R. Mehta, Public Prosecutor for the State.
I have heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and carefully gone through the impugned order.
The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the accused applicant has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the co-accused. He submits that no contraband material was recovered from him. According to learned counsel, accused applicant is in jail since long, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail.
On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.
I have considered the submissions made before me and carefully gone through the material available on record.
Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, I think it just and proper to enlarge the accused applicant on bail.
Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that the applicant
Suresh Das son Kanhaiya Das shall be released on bail in FIR
No.31/2006 P.S. Rathanjana, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.
(SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK), J.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.