High Court of Rajasthan
Case Law Search
A C T O ANTI EVASION WARD II A v RAMESH CHAND - STR Case No. 46 of 2001  RD-RJ 1617 (21 July 2006)
S.B. Sales Tax Revision Petition No.46/01
ACTO Vs. Ramesh Chand
Date of Order : 21/07/2006
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi
Mr. R.B. Mathur, for petitioner
Instant revision petition has been filed against the order dated 9th March, 1999 passed by the
Rajasthan Tax Board whereby after taking the factual aspect of the matter into consideration of assessment year 1965-66, the learned Board recorded a finding that the order of assessment has not been passed within statutory time provided under Section 10B(2) read with Rule 37 of Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954.
Counsel for petitioner submits that the factual statement, which has been recorded by the learned
Board in its order impugned, is incorrect and the impugned order was communicated in the Month of
April, 1992, as such the period should commence from the date of actual communication.
In my opinion, it is a question of fact with respect to date of communication and the learned
Board recorded a finding with regard to communication under order impugned.
I do not find any legal question which emerges for consideration in the present revision petition.
However, apart from it, the assessment is of 1965- 66, I am otherwise also not inclined to re-open such settled assessments after more than two decades.
Consequently, the revision petition fails and is hereby dismissed. [Ajay Rastogi],J.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.