KAMLESH versus SMT.PARAS KUMARI

High Court of Rajasthan

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

KAMLESH v SMT.PARAS KUMARI - CFA Case No. 604 of 2004 [2006] RD-RJ 170 (8 February 2006)

S.B. Civil First Appeal No.604/2004

Date : 8th February, 2006.

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK

Mr. Rajendra Charan for appellant.

Mr. Rajesh Parihar for respondent.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the parties have reached to a compromise, therefore, there remains nothing to be decided. He seeks permission to withdraw the appeal. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to it.

In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the appellant, permission to withdraw the appeal is granted. The appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(SATYA PRAKASH PATHAK),J.

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.