High Court of Rajasthan
Case Law Search
LRS OF MEHAR DEEN v CHANDO & ORS. - CSA Case No. 307 of 2005  RD-RJ 18 (3 January 2006)
S.B.CIVIL SECOND APPEAL NO.307/2005
L.Rs. of Shri Mehar Deen vs.
Chando and others.
DATE OF JUDGMENT ::: 3.1.2006
HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J.
Mr. AK Acharya, for the appellant.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant.
The appellant/plaintiff is aggrieved against the findings recorded by the two courts below as the trial court decreed the counter claim filed by the defendants after dismissing the suit of the plaintiff vide judgment and decree dated 8.7.1996 against which the appellant preferred an appeal which was dismissed by the first appellate court vide its judgment and decree dated 10.5.2005.
According to learned counsel for the appellant, the courts below committed serious error of law in decreeing the counter claim of the defendants and dismissing the suit of the plaintiff.
It will be worthwhile to mention here that the plaintiff's evidence was closed and the defendants could not get an opportunity to cross examine the plaintiff. The defendants' evidence also remained unrebutted.
Two courts below, after appreciation of the evidence, held that the plaintiff encroached upon the land of way as well as land of public chowk. The finding of fact is not vitiated by any reason and the appellant has not even placed on record the order by which the evidence of the plaintiff was closed.
In view of the above, I do not find any substantial question of law involved in this appeal, therefore, this appeal deserves to be dismissed, hence, dismissed.
(PRAKASH TATIA), J.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.