Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST, JODHPUR versus JODHPUR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PVT.LTD.

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST, JODHPUR v JODHPUR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PVT.LTD. - CMA Case No. 239 of 1994 [2006] RD-RJ 2292 (16 October 2006)

S.B.Civil Misc. Appeal No.239/94

U.I.T. Jodhpur vs. Jodhpur Construction Co.

Date of Order: 16.10.2006

HON'BLE MR. PRAKASH TATIA, J.

Mr. Rajesh Joshi for the appellant.

Mr. M.C.Bhoot for the respondent.

The learned counsel for the respondent submits that the appeal has become infructuous in view of the fact that the present appeal has been preferred against the injunction order dated 1.10.1993 but the main suit itself has been decided by the trial court.

In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.

( PRAKASH TATIA ),J. mlt.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.