High Court of Rajasthan
Case Law Search
BHURA v STATE - CRLMB Case No. 6766 of 2006  RD-RJ 2573 (9 November 2006)
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.6766/2006
Bhura Vs. State of Rajasthan
Date Of Order :: 9.11.2006
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jitendra Ray Goyal
Mr. G.S. Fauzdar, counsel for petitioner.
Mr. R.P. Kuldeep, Public Prosecutor for State. ....................
Heard learned counsel for accused petitioner, learned Public
Prosecutor for the State and perused the material produced during the course of arguments.
It is contended on behalf of the accused petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this matter on account of the village rivalry.
It is also submitted that the so called buffalow has been recovered from some relative of the complainant party.
Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.
Without making any observation on merits, having considered the rival submissions made at the bar, nature of accusation, material on record and all other facts and circumstances, I deem it proper to grant the benefit of pre-arrest bail to accused petitioner Bhura.
In the result, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Bhura S/o. Late
Tulsi, he shall be released on bail by the concerned
SHO/Investigating Officer in FIR No.257/2006 registered at Police
Station Kumher provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- together with two sureties each in the sum of
Rs.5,000/- to his satisfaction on the following conditions:- 1. that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; 2. that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and 3. that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of Court.
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.