Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ROOPDAS versus STATE

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


ROOPDAS v STATE - CRLA Case No. 778 of 2006 [2006] RD-RJ 2880 (22 November 2006)

In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan

At

Jaipur Bench, Jaipur

ORDER

In

S.B. Criminal Appeal No.778/2006

Roop Das Vs. State of Rajasthan

Date Of Order :: 22.11.2006

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jitendra Ray Goyal

Mr. Vijay Yadav, counsel for appellant.

Mr. R.P. Kuldeep, Public Prosecutor for State. .....................

Heard learned counsel for accused appellant and learned Public Prosecutor for the

State on the prayer for suspension of sentence awarded to the accused appellant Roop Das who has been convicted for the offence under sections 366 & 342 IPC and maximum sentence awarded to him is five years rigorous imprisonment and fine of

Rs.500/- under section 366 IPC, and perused the record of the court below

It is contended on behalf of the accused appellant that even according to the FIR no case is made out for having committed an offence of abduction or kidnapping. It is also submitted that during the course of trial the accused appellant was on bail and at present he is in

Central Jail, Alwar.

Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer for suspension of sentence.

Without expressing any opinion on merits, having considered the rival submissions made at the bar and entire facts and circumstances, I deem it proper to suspend the sentence of imprisonment awarded to the accused appellant till disposal of this appeal and to release him on bail.

It is, therefore, ordered that the sentence of imprisonment awarded to the accused appellant Roop Das shall remain suspended during the pendency of this appeal and he shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.20,000/- together with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before this Court on 22nd December, 2006 and whenever called upon to do so.

(J.R. Goyal),J.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.