Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

NARENDRA SINGH versus STATE

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


NARENDRA SINGH v STATE - CRLMB Case No. 6724 of 2006 [2006] RD-RJ 3039 (30 November 2006)

In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan

At

Jaipur Bench, Jaipur

ORDER

In

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.6724/06

Narendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan 30th November, 2006

Date Of Order ::

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jitendra Ray Goyal

Mr. Akash Kumar Agarwal on behalf of

Mr. Sanjay Singhal, for petitioner.

Mr. R.P. Kuldeep, Public Prosecutor for State. ....................

Heard learned counsel for accused petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the State, perused the case diary and other material produced during the course of arguments.

It is contended on behalf of the accused petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this matter, he is a student and he was not involved in such type of matters in the past also.

It is also submitted that when he went to the police station on the directions of this Court to assist in the investigation he was beaten by the police and police recorded his interrogation at its own and got his signatures on the interrogation report. It is also submitted that co-accused persons have been arrested and they all have been enlarged on bail and the only allegation against the accused petitioner is of theft of small articles like plate, steel etc.

Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.

Without making any observations on merits, having considered the rival submissions made at the bar, nature of accusation, material on record and all other facts and circumstances, I deem it proper to grant the benefit of pre-arrest bail to accused petitioner Narendra Singh.

In the result, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Narendra Singh

S/o. Meghraj, he shall be released on bail by the concerned

SHO/Investigating Officer in FIR No.91/2006 registered at Police

Station Mothpur, District Baran provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- together with two sureties each in the sum of Rs.5,000/- to the satisfaction of the concerned

SHO/Investigating Officer on the following conditions :- 1. that he shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; 2. that he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the

Court or any police officer; and 3. that he shall not leave India without previous permission of the

Court.

(J.R. Goyal),J

VS Shekhawat/-

Jr. P.A.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.