Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

STATE AND ORS versus SHRI SURENDRA AND ORS

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


STATE AND ORS v SHRI SURENDRA AND ORS - CW Case No. 1117 of 2001 [2006] RD-RJ 3041 (30 November 2006)

/1/

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR

ORDER

S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 1117/2001

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

Vs.

SHRI SURENDRA S. RAI & ORS.

Date: 30.11.2006.

HON'BLE MR. K.S. RATHORE, J.

Mr. B.S. Chhaba, Addl. G.A. for the petitioners.

Mr. V.K. Mathur for the respondent/s.

****

This writ petition is directed against the order dated 14.12.99 passed by the Rajasthan Civil

Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur (for short 'the

Tribunal'), by which the Tribunal while accepting the appeal has directed to promote the respondent No.1 Shri

Surendra S. Rai from the post of Executive Engineer to the post of Superintending Engineer against the quota of year 1998-99 with all consequential benefits.

In the considered view, the directions which are given by the Tribunal are per se illegal. At the most, the Tribunal can direct the petitioners to consider the case of the respondent for promotion on the post of Superintending Engineer against the year 1998-99 from the date his juniors have been given /2/ promotion and for that purpose, the petitioners can hold the review DPC.

In view of the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands partly allowed and the impugned order dated 14.12.99 passed by the Rajasthan

Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur is herewith quashed and set-aside. The petitioners are directed to consider the case of the respondent for promotion on the post of Superintending Engineer against the year 1998-99 from the date his juniors are given promotion on the said post by holding a review DPC and if the respondent is otherwise found suitable, he may be given the benefit of promotion. Since the respondent is retiring from service today i.e. 30.11.2006, he will get only notional benefits if he is found suitable for promotion by the review DPC and retiral benefits only.

(K.S. RATHORE),J. /KKC/


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.