Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

CHAND KAUR & ORS versus ROHIDAS & ORS

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


CHAND KAUR & ORS v ROHIDAS & ORS - CMA Case No. 293 of 2006 [2006] RD-RJ 305 (6 March 2006)

S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO. 293/2006

Date : 06.03.2006

HON'BLE MR. BHAGWATI PRASAD.J.

Mr. Sanjay Poonia for the appellant

------------

Heard.

The present appeal is filed for enhancement of the award. The deceased was allegedly 40 years of age in postmortem report. However, the

Tribunal has considered the age to be 33 years and while considering the income of the deceased, came to the conclusion that he was earning Rs.2400/- per month as against the certificate of Rs.2220/-. Thus, a legitimate consideration of the monthly income has been taken by the Tribunal. In that background, if a multiplier of 16 has been used, that is not considered to be in- appropriate. The award does not suffer from any illegality. The appeal having no force is hereby dismissed.

(BHAGWATI PRASAD), J. bjsh


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.