Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

JAMEEL HUSSAIN & ORS versus MACT, SIKAR AND ORS

High Court of Rajasthan

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


JAMEEL HUSSAIN & ORS v MACT, SIKAR AND ORS - CW Case No. 3671 of 2006 [2006] RD-RJ 3067 (4 December 2006)

SB Civil Writ Petition No. 3671/2006

Jameel Hussain & ors Vs MACT, Sikar & ors 4.12.2006

Hon'ble Mr Justice Ashok Parihar

Mr Anoop Dhand for petitioners

BY THE COURT:

Since petitioner No.1 is major, the Tribunal is directed to pass fresh orders in regard to disbursement of interim compensation to the extent of his share. The

Tribunal, however, may take into consideration interest of other three minor petitioners while passing fresh order of disbursement.

With the above observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

(Ashok Parihar) J. bnsharma


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.